This page has been automatically translated. Please refer to the page in French if needed.
Working time
Is it possible to make a penalty payment without being required to be contacted?
Publié le 19 décembre 2024 - Directorate for Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister)
An employee who is not subject by his employer to the obligation to be reachable and available does not perform a stand-by period. This is what the Court of Cassation said in a ruling on December 4, 2024.
An employee, who is responsible for security, is dismissed by his employer. It shall bring the matter before the courts and claim damages for failure to pay periodic penalty payments.
The Court of Appeal upholds the employee’s application and convicts the employer. In her opinion, the employee was on a stand-by duty when the alarm was triggered because he answered dozens of calls from the remote monitoring business following an alarm call. In addition, he gave instructions and moved to the company premises three times. The employer appeals to the Court of Cassation.
The Court of Cassation quashes and quashes the appeal decision. In her view, the employee was not one of the company members to be contacted in the event of the establishment's alarm being triggered. He was therefore not obliged to remain reachable, answer calls, or intervene if necessary.
Thus, the employee who intervenes following the triggering of an alarm does not necessarily complete a standby period.
Additional topics
Service-Public.fr
Agenda
Jusqu'au 31 déc. 2024
Aide énergie
Publié le 26 novembre 2024
À partir du 1 janv. 2025
Visites médicales
Publié le 22 novembre 2024