Le lien vers cette page a été envoyé avec succès aux destinataires.
Request a review of a judicial decision (criminal or civil)
Verified 27 September 2023 - Directorate of Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister), Ministry of Justice
The revision a final decision allows a request for a re-examination of the case in very limited cases.
It's about decisions civilian or penal.
We present you with the information you need to know.
What applies to you ?
Veuillez patienter pendant le chargement de la page
Criminal trial
The review of a criminal decision allows a new examination of the case to be requested for rejudge the case and cancel condemnation.
It's an extraordinary and exceptional, limited to cases very rare.
The review may be requested by:
- Sentenced person or, in the case of incapacitation, sound legal representative
- Spouse, cohabiting partner, Civil partnership partner, parents, children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, or legatees in the event of death or absence of the sentenced person
- Attorney General to the court of appeal
- Prosecutor General of the Court of Cassation
- Minister of Justice
Only one person convicted for a offense or a crime may apply for review. This procedure is not open for contraventions.
FYI
a convicted person may also request a review of a final criminal decision following a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
This judgment must establish that the decision was made in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights.
This violation must have serious consequences for the convicted person to justify a request for review. The review shall be requested in a period of one year from the date of the ECHR decision.
Review may be requested where a person is convicted and a new fact appears or a unknown element on the day of trial is discovered after conviction.
These new facts or elements must be susceptible to establish innocence of the convicted person or to give rise to a doubt about his guilt.
The case is re-examined while the original decision is definitive.
This remedy is available against a decision of the court of justice, the court of appeal, the criminal court or the court of assize.
There's no no time limit to file an application for review.
An application for review may be initiated even if the convicted person has died.
The prescription the facts do not preclude a request for review.
Filing of the application
The request must be addressed by post the Court of Review and Review.
This court is located at the Court of Cassation.
It is composed of magistrates of the Court of Cassation.
Who shall I contact
The Court of Review and Reconsideration shall consist of a committee of inquiry and a formation of the court.
The committee of inquiry conduct an initial review of the admissibility of the application.
It may, after a possible investigation, refer the case to the formation of the court. In this case, the formation of the court has a 2nd examination. It may decide that the conviction should be quashed and the case retried.
Step 1: Examination by the investigating committee
The file is entrusted to the committee of inquiry of the Court of Review and Review. The commission must examine the admissibility of the demand.
If the demand is obvious inadmissible, it may be immediately rejected by the commission in a decision setting out the reasons for the rejection.
It doesn't exist no appeal against that decision.
Before making its decision, the Board may order a additional information for investigative acts to be carried out (hearing, expertise...). The applicant may request the carrying out of investigative acts. The committee may reject that request. It must give its decision on this matter within three months.
Where a new person appears to be involved in the facts, the investigating committee shall notify the public prosecutor who is to conduct an investigation. If necessary, he can open a judicial inquiry.
Please note
the condemned person or the committee of inquiry may request the suspension of the conviction, in particular if the convicted person is in prison. This request is being examined by the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation.
Before deciding whether the request is admissible, the commission will ask for oral or written observations. They shall be requested from the applicant or his lawyer, public prosecutor's office and any civil party or his lawyer.
After the debates, the commission makes a decision.
If the application is considered admissible, the formation of the court is seized.
If the application is not admissible, the procedure ends and the decision will not be reviewed.
Reasons must be given for the decision. It doesn't exist no appeal against that decision.
FYI
the applicant and the civil party may request a copy of the file. The copy must be issued within one month of the request. The first copy is free.
2nd stage: examination by the formation of the court
It's the formation of the court who decides whether or not to review the conviction.
If it considers that the case is not ready for trial, the formation of the court may request a additional information (hearing, expertise...).
When the case is ready, a hearing takes place. At that hearing, the applicant or his lawyer, the public prosecutor's office, any civil party or his lawyer shall be heard.
After the hearing, the formation of the court makes a decision.
She can dismiss or accept the request for review.
If she refuse, the original conviction is confirmed.
If she accept, the conviction is canceled.
FYI
any person authorized to appeal for review may request new acts (hearing, expert opinion...) by request to the public prosecutor. The purpose of the acts is to reveal new facts or elements. In the event of refusal, the appeal shall be made to the Attorney-General of the Court of Appeal.
The formation of the court may request a retrial before another court identical to that which gave the contested decision. For example, a reference to another Court of Appeal if the decision under appeal was made by a Court of Appeal.
The Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation may order the suspension of the prison sentence of the data subject. She'll be free until her retrial. If not, she will be released at the end of her original sentence.
The formation of the court may decide that there will be no retrial in any of the following cases:
- The convicted person has died (his innocence is still recognized)
- There's prescription. In this case, the person is definitively found innocent. If she is still imprisoned, she is released.
- The facts which justified the review completely exonerate the person concerned. In this case, the person is definitively found innocent. If she is imprisoned, she is released.
- In case amnesty
- In case ofcriminal irresponsibility
The decision of the formation of the court shall not be subject to appeal.
If the convict is innocent, the conviction is removed from sound criminal record.
The exonerated person can request that the decision be published in certain places (city where the decision was pronounced, municipality of the applicant...). It will also be published in the Official Journal and in five newspapers by the court which issued the decision.
FYI
a convicted person found innocent following a review has the right to right to claim compensation for material and non-material damage what the conviction caused him. Any person who can justify harm caused by the conviction may also seek compensation. The compensation is paid by the State.
For the examination on the admissibility of the request by the commission, the applicant may file the application himself or by his lawyer.
For the remainder of the procedure, he must be represented by a lawyer of his choice.
Who shall I contact
If the applicant does not have a lawyer, the Court of Review and Review shall appoint one ex officio.
The victim/civil party may be represented by a lawyer chosen by it or appointed ex officio if it does not know one.
The procedure itself is free.
The attorney's fees are payable by the applicant.
If the party does not have sufficient income, it may apply for legal aid.
Civil trial
A review of a civil court decision is possible when a fraud is at its origin or that a decisive part is found after the trial. After consideration of the grounds for review, the conviction may be partially or totally reviewed.
The review of a civil decision allows, under certain conditions, replace the contested decision. We're talking about retraction of judgment. When fraud (e.g., false testimony) has led to a decision or evidence (e.g., an invoice) is found after the trial, review may be requested.
Review may be requested by persons who have been parties to the judgment (applicant, defendant,...).
It may also be requested by persons who have been represented at the trial as a minor child represented by his or her parents.
Review may be requested by a third party if he justifies that he has interest in bringing proceedings. For example, the new owner of a building affected by disorder intervenes to receive compensation instead of the former owners.
A request for review shall be accepted only in one of the following cases:
- The decision was made in favor of a party (applicant, defendant) through a fraud on his part.
- Of decisive evidence which had been withheld by a party have been found after judgment.
- Of documents, evidence, oaths or attestations have been declared false by court order after judgment.
The party making the request for review must provide the evidence.
Please note
some decisions, such as an order in council interlocutory or a judgment right-hand forerunnermay not be the subject of an application for review. For example, a judgment that orders an expert opinion in the context of poorly performed work in a house.
The request for review must be made within 2 months from the day on which the person became aware of the evidence justifying the review.
Filing of the application
The request is made by quotation.
It is an act of the Commissioner of Justice (formerly bailiff) who informs the opposing party of his summons before the court which issued the contested decision.
It can be a court of law, a community court or an appeal court.
The summons must be sent by the Commissioner of Justice to all parties referred to in the contested decision.
The appeal shall be communicated to the public prosecutor's office.
If the appeal is against a decision used as a document in a new dispute, review may be requested in the same trial. The dispute must be between the same parties and take place before the same court than the decision giving rise to the initial decision.
Example :
When a divorce judgment, which is the subject of an application for review, is used in another proceeding before the Court of Justice Jaf: titleContent for a dispute concerning the residence of the couple's child.
FYI
the party requesting the review must do so in the same manner as it submits the remainder of its requests (in the conclusions of his lawyer, for example).
Judgment
The judge must first consider whether the action is admissible. He's checking if the time limit of the appeal is respected or if there is a pattern justifying the revision (fraud, new document, etc.).
If the appeal is admissible, the judge may settle the dispute directly with the new information at his disposal. In that case, only one decision is rendered.
If the judge cannot rule on the application for review because there is a lack of evidence, he or she may ask for a additional instruction (e.g. expertise). In this case, the judge makes a first decision on the admissibility of the application, then a second decision to settle the dispute after the additional information.
A decision may be revised partially or totally, which means that the judge can review all convictions or only certain convictions.
Appeals
The review decision may be subject to the same appeal that the original decision (call or appeal in cassation as appropriate).
It cannot be the subject of another review appeal.
When the representation by lawyer was obligatory in the initial trial, the plaintiff must be to be represented by a lawyer during the review procedure.
The procedure is free.
The attorney's fees and of the Commissioner of Justice must be paid by the applicant.
If they do not have sufficient resources to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Justice and/or counsel, they can ask legal aid.
Who can help me?
Find who can answer your questions in your region
Telephone administrative information - Allo Public Service
For more information on this topic, you can contact Allô Service Public.
Attention: the service does not have access to users' personal files and cannot therefore provide information on their status.
- Lundi : de 08h30 à 17h30
- Mardi : de 08h30 à 12h15
- Mercredi : de 08h30 à 12h15
- Jeudi : de 08h30 à 17h30
- Vendredi : de 13h00 à 16h15
- Service free
The informants who answer you are from the Department of Justice.
- House of Justice and the Law
- Lawyer
Appeal for review of criminal proceedings
Appeal for review of civil proceedings
FAQ
Service-Public.fr